Mapeamento sistemático da literatura para compras públicas sustentáveis

Vanessa de Oliveira e Roberta Dalvo Pereira da Conceição

Resumo
Toda pesquisa tem seu início com a construção de uma base de conhecimento a respeito de determinado assunto, para isso, o pesquisador realiza uma análise de publicações científicas e literárias, que embasam seu estudo. O Mapeamento Sistemático da Literatura é um estudo secundário, que foi utilizado para esse trabalho com o intuito de buscar uma literatura que identificasse pesquisas relacionadas a abordagens de apoio para a rastreabilidade de temas que envolvam, de uma forma geral, compras públicas sustentáveis e responder questões sobre tendências de pesquisas na área. Sendo assim, objetivo deste artigo é relatar os resultados do estudo realizado. O intuito era criar uma base inicial para fundamentar a pesquisa com tema específico sobre compras públicas sustentáveis, assim como, elaborar um catálogo de pesquisas que poderão servir de base para futuras pesquisas sobre algum tema dentro do assunto relacionado ao desenvolvimento sustentável. Para uma utilização correta do mapeamento sistemático (MS), foi necessário o desenvolvimento de três etapas que são: planejamento da revisão, condução da revisão e o relatório da revisão. As publicações foram analisadas e as que se destacavam em relação aos assuntos referentes ao desenvolvimento sustentável e gestão sustentável, de maneira a contribuir, assim como relacionados a compras ou contratações sustentáveis, compras e contratações públicas sustentáveis e que de alguma forma geravam um desafio para o estudo, foram selecionados. Foram apresentados os resultados, onde o processo de busca retornou 6.763 estudos, dos quais 306 estudos relevantes inicialmente foram selecionados. Esses estudos, após a extração, diminuíram para 111 estudos classificadas como relevantes e de qualidade, que formaram uma base inicial para a pesquisa. Os estudos selecionados apresentaram alguns desafios e apresentaram investigações sobre economia circular e gerenciamento de cadeia de suprimentos verdes, os quais apresentaram imaturidade em suas áreas de pesquisa e podem ser temas para futuros trabalhos.

Palavras-chave
Mapeamento sistemático; Compras sustentáveis; Desenvolvimento sustentável.

Abstract
Systematic literature mapping for a study on sustainable public purchases. Every research begins upon the construction of a knowledge base regarding such matter, thereunto the researcher analyses scientific and literary publications that base his study. The Systematic Mapping of the Literature is a secondary study that was used in this work in order to search such a literature that could identify researches related to supportive approaches for the traceability of topics involving, in general, sustainable public procurement and answer questions on research trends in the area. Thus, this article aims at reporting the results of the performed study. The goal was to create an initial base to ground researches regarding specifically sustainable public procurement, as well as elaborating a research catalog that might ground future researches about any theme regarding sustainable development. For the adequate usage of the Systematic Mapping (SM) it was necessary the development of three stages: review planning, review performing, and review reporting. The publications were analyzed and the ones that stood out relating to subjects on sustainable development and management in order to contribute as well as related to sustainable procurement or contracting, sustainable public procurement and contracting and that somehow create a challenge for the study were selected. The results were presented where the research process retrieved 6.763 studies, of which 306 relevant studies were initially selected. Those studies, after the extraction, decreased to 111 relevant and quality studies that built an initial base for the research. The selected studies presented some challenges and inquiries about circular economy and green supply chain management that showed immaturity in its research areas and might be a theme for future research.

Keywords
Systematic mapping; Sustainable purchasing; Sustainable development.

DOI
10.21438/rbgas(2020)071723

Texto completo
PDF

Referências
Aldenius, M.; Khan, J. Strategic use of green public procurement in the bus sector: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 164, p. 250-257, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.196

Ardente, F.; Peiró, L. T.; Matheiux, F.; Polverini, D. Accounting for the environmental benefits of remanufactured products: Method and application. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 198, p. 1545-1558, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.012

Bae, H. S. The effect of environmental capabilities on environmental strategy and environmental performance of Korean exporters for green supply chain management. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, v. 33, p. 167-176, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.09.006

Bansia, M.; Varkey, J. K.; Agrawal, S. Development of a reverse logistics performance measurement system for a battery manufacturer. Procedia Materials Science, v. 6, p. 1419-1427, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.121

Biderman, R.; Macedo, L. S. V.; Monzoni, M.; Mazon, R. (Orgs.). Guia de compras públicas sustentáveis: uso do poder de compra do governo para a promoção do desenvolvimento sustentável. Rio de Janeiro: ICLEI, Editora FGV, 2008.

Bidin, Z. A.; Bohari, A. A. M.; Rais, S. L. A.; Saferi, M. M. Green related practices for construction procurement. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, v. 140, 012099, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012099

Brasil. Decreto n^o 10.024, de 20 de setembro de 2019. Regulamenta a licitação, na modalidade pregão, na forma eletrônica, para a aquisição de bens e a contratação de serviços comuns, incluídos os serviços comuns de engenharia, e dispõe sobre o uso da dispensa eletrônica, no âmbito da administração pública federal. Disponível em: <http://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/decreto-n-10.024-de-20-de-setembro-de-2019-217537021>. Acesso em: 26 abr. 2020.

Brasil. Decreto n^o 7.746, de 5 de junho de 2012. Regulamenta o art. 3^o da Lei n^o 8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993, para estabelecer critérios e práticas para a promoção do desenvolvimento nacional sustentável nas contratações realizadas pela administração pública federal direta, autárquica e fundacional e pelas empresas estatais dependentes, e institui a Comissão Interministerial de Sustentabilidade na Administração Pública - CISAP. (Redação dada pelo Decreto n^o 9.178, de 2017). Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2012/Decreto/D7746.htm>. Acesso em: 06 jan. 2020.

Brasil. Lei n^o 12.349, de 15 de dezembro de 2010. Altera as Leis n^os 8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993, 8.958, de 20 de dezembro de 1994, e 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004; e revoga o § 1^o do art. 2^o da Lei n^o 11.273, de 6 de fevereiro de 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2007-2010/2010/Lei/L12349.htm>. Acesso em: 06 jan. 2020.

Brasil. Lei n^o 8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993. Regulamenta o art. 37, inciso XXI, da Constituição Federal, institui normas para licitações e contratos da Administração Pública e dá outras providências. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8666cons.htm>. Acesso em: 06 jan. 2020.

Bruce-Hyrkas, T.; Pasanen, P.; Castro, R. Overview of whole building life-cycle assessment for green building certification and ecodesign through industry surveys and interviews. Procedia CIRP, v. 69, p. 178-183, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.127

Brzozowska, A.; Bubel, D.; Pabian, A. Implementation of technical and information systems in environmental management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 213, p. 992-999, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.110

Buchert, T.; Neugebauer, S.; Schenker, S.; Lindow, K.; Stark, R. Multi-criteria Decision making as a tool for sustainable product development: Benefits and obstacles. Procedia CIRP, v. 26, p. 70-75, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.110

Buniamin, S.; Ahmad, N.; Rauf, F. H. A.; Johari, N. H.; Rashid, A. A. Green Government Procurement Practices (GGP) in Malaysian public enterprise. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 35, p. 27-34, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00006-X

Capasso, M.; Hansen, T.; Heiberg, J.; Klitkou, A.; Steen, M. Green growth: A synthesis of scientific findings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 146, p. 390-402, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.013

Cerutti, A. K.; Ardente, F.; Contu, S.; Donno, D.; Beccaro, G. L. Modelling, assessing, and ranking public procurement options for a climate-friendly catering service. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, v. 23, p. 95–115, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1306-y

Chin. T. A.; Tat, H. H.; Sulaiman, Z. Green supply chain management, environmental collaboration and sustainability performance. Procedia CIRP, v. 26, p. 695-699, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.035

Chun, S.-H.; Hwang, H. J.; Byun, Y.-H. Green supply chain management in the construction industry: Case of Korean construction companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 186, p. 507-512, 2015a. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.192

Chun, S.-H.; Hwang, H. J.; Byun, Y.-H. Supply chain process and green business activities: Application to small and medium enterprises. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 186, p. 862-867, 2015b. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.191

Ciulli, F.; Kolk, A. Incumbents and business model innovation for the sharing economy: Implications for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 214, p. 995-1010, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.295

Cole, C.; Gnanapragasam, A.; Cooper, T.; Singh, J. Assessing barriers to reuse of electrical and electronic equipment, a UK perspective. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X, v. 1, p. 100004, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100004

Costa, F.; Prendeville, S.; Beverley, K.; Teso, G.; Brooker, C. Sustainable product-service systems for an office furniture manufacturer: How insights from a pilot study can inform PSS design. Procedia CIRP, v. 30, p. 66-71, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.109

Costa, B. B. F.; Motta, A. L. T. S. Key factors hindering sustainable procurement in the Brazilian Public sector: A Delphi study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, v. 14, p. 152-171, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V14-N2-152-171

Crafoord, K.; Dalhammar, C.; Milios, L. The use of public procurement to incentivize longer lifetime and remanufacturing of computers. Procedia CIRP, v. 73, p. 137-141, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.316

Cristina, M. D. Saferational approach to a valid sustainable development. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 8, p. 497-504, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00119-1

Diyar, S.; Akparova, A.; Toktabayev, A.; Tyutunnikova, M. Green economy: Innovation-based development of Kazakhstan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 140, p. 695-699, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.497

Duran, D. C.; Gogan, L. M.; Artene, A.; Duran, V. The components of sustainable development: A possible approach. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 26, p. 806-811, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00849-7

Dvoraková, L.; Zborková, J. Integration of sustainable development at enterprise level. Procedia Engineering, v. 69, p. 686-695, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.043

Edler, J.; Yeow, Y. Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Research Policy, v. 45, p. 414-426, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.010

El Yamany, S.; Afifi, M.; Hassan, A. Applicability and implementation of U.S. Green Building Council Rating System (LEED) in Egypt (a longitudinal study for Egyptian LEED certified buildings). Procedia Environmental Sciences, v. 34, p. 594-604, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.052

Eryigit, N.; Ozcure, G. Eco-innovation as modern era strategy of companies in developing countries: Comparison between Turkey and European Union. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 195, p. 1216-1225, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.246

Falbo, R. A.; Souza, E. F.; Felizardo, K. R. Mapeamento sistemático. In: Felizardo, K.; Nakagawa, E.; Fabbri, S.; Ferrari, F. (Orgs.). Revisão sistemática da literatura em Engenharia de Software: teoria e prática. 1 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2017. p. 79-98. Disponível em: <http://falbo.inf.ufes.br/files/MP/TP/Sobre_MS.pdf>. Acesso em: 06 jan. 2020.

Filippi, M.; Sirombo, E. Green rating of existing school facilities. Energy Procedia, v. 78, p. 3156-3161, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.773

Foukaras, A.; Toma, L. Buying and wasting sustainably: Determinants of green behaviour in Cyprus and Sweden. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 14, p. 200-229, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00705-9

Freidenfelds, D.; Kalnins, S. N.; Gusca, J. What does environmentally sustainable higher education institution mean? Energy Procedia, v. 147, p. 42-47, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.031

Galankashi, M. R.; Chegeni, A.; Soleimanynanadegany, A.; Memari, A.; Anjomshoae. A.; Helmi, A. H.; Dargi, D. Prioritizing green supplier selection criteria using fuzzy analytical network process. Procedia CIRP, v. 26, p. 689-694, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.044

Geng, R.; Mansouri, A.; Aktas, E. The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 183, p. 245-258, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.10.008

Ghadimi, P.; Heavey, C. Sustainable supplier selection in medical device industry: Toward sustainable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, v. 15, p. 165–170, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.096

Ghisetti, C. Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 125, p. 178-187, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.020

Gil, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.

Harris, K.; Divakarla, S. Supply chain risk to reward: Responsible procurement and the role of ecolabels. Procedia Engineering, v. 180, p. 1603-1611, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.323

Hauschild, M. Better: But is it good enough? On the need to consider both eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness to gauge industrial sustainability. Procedia CIRP, v. 29, p. 1-7, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.126

Hayles, C. Environmentally sustainable interior design: A snapshot of current supply of and demand for green, sustainable or fair trade products for interior design practice. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, v. 4, p. 100-108, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.03.006

Hughes, R. The EU circular economy package: Life cycle thinking to life cycle law? Procedia CIRP, v. 61, p. 10-16, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.12.006

Iacovidou, E.; Velis, C. A.; Purnell, P.; Zwirner, O.; Brown, A.; Hahladakis, J.; Millward-Hopkins, J.; Williams, P. T. Metrics for optimising the multi-dimensional value of resources recovered from waste in a circular economy: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 166, p. 910-938, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.100

ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability. Global lead city network on sustainable procurement. 2019. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.149

Inti, S.; Sharma, M.; Tandon, V. An approach for performing life cycle impact assessment of pavements for evaluating alternative pavement designs. Procedia Engineering, v. 145, p. 964-971, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.125

Irfan M.; Hassan, M.; Hassan, N. Unravelling the fuzzy effect of economic, social and environmental sustainability on the corporate reputation of public-sector organizations: A case study of Pakistan. Sustainability, v. 10, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030769

Ivascu, L.; Mocan, M.; Draghici, A.; Turi, A.; Rus, S. Modeling the green supply chain in the context of sustainable development. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 26, p. 702-708, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00819-9

Jayanti, R. K.; Gowda, M. V. R. Sustainability dilemmas in emerging economies. IIMB Management Review, v. 26, p. 130-142, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2014.03.004

Jayant, A.; Azhar, M. Analysis of the barriers for implementing Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) practices: An Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) approach. Procedia Engineering, v. 97, p. 2157-2166, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.459

Jayant, A.; Gupta, P.; Garg, S. K. Simulation modelling and analysis of network design for closed-loop supply Chain: A case study of battery industry. Procedia Engineering, v. 97, p. 2213-2221, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.465

Jedlinski, M. The position of green logistics in sustainable development of a smart green city. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 151, p. 102-111, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.011

Jonkutè, G. The consumers' approach to sustainable consumption and production: A case study in Lithuania. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, v. 71, p. 28-46, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.71.4.13642

Jørgensen, M. S.; Remmen, A. A Methodological approach to development of circular economy options in businesses. Procedia CIRP, v. 69, p. 816-821, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.002

Joshi, Y.; Rahman, Z. Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, v. 3, p. 128-143, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001

Kalmykova, Y.; Sadagopan, M.; Rosado, L. Circular economy: From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 135, p. 190-201, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034

Karimi, A.; Rahim, K. A. Classification of external stakeholders pressures in green supply chain management. Procedia Environmental Sciences, v. 30, p. 27-32, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.005

Kern, E.; Hilty, L. M.; Guldner, A.; Maksimov, Y. V.; Filler, A.; Groger, J.; Naumann, S. Sustainable software products: Towards assessment criteria for resource and energy efficiency. Future Generation Computer Systems, v. 86, p. 199-210, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.02.044

Khoshbakht, M.; Gou, Z.; Dupre, K. Cost-benefit prediction of green buildings: SWOT analysis of research methods and recent applications. Procedia Engineering, v. 180, p. 167-178, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.176

Kitchenham, B.; Brereton, O. P.; Budgen, D.; Turner, M.; Bailey, J.; Linkman, S. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, v. 51, n. 1, p. 7-15, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009

Kitchenham, B.; Charters, S. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in Software Engineering. Keele: Keele University, University of Durham, 2007. (Version 2.)

Kitchenham, B.; Pretorius, R.; Budgen, D.; Brereton, O. P.; Turner, M.; Niazi, M.; Linkman, S. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, v. 52, n. 8, p. 792-805, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006

Knight, L.; Pfeiffer, A.; Scott, J. Supply market uncertainty: Exploring consequences and responses within sustainability transitions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, v. 21, p. 167-177, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2015.04.002

Konys, A. An ontology-based knowledge modelling for a sustainability assessment domain. Sustainability, v. 11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020300

Konys, A. Green supplier selection criteria: From a literature review to a comprehensive knowledge base. Sustainability, v. 11, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154208

Kravchenko, M.; McAloone, T. C.; Pigosso, D. C. A. Implications of developing a tool for sustainability screening of circular economy initiatives. Procedia CIRP, v. 80, p. 625-630, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.01.044

Kuittinen, M. Setting the carbon footprint criteria for public construction projects. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 21, p. 154-161, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00162-8

Kumar, D.; Rahman, Z. Sustainability adoption through buyer supplier relationship across supply chain: A literature review and conceptual framework. International Strategic Management Review, v. 3, p. 110-127, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.002

Leendertse, W.; Arts, J.; Ridder, H. Sustainable market involvement in transport infrastructure management. Transportation Research Procedia, v. 14, p. 2936-2945, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.414

Lintukangas K.; Kahkonen, A.-K.; Hallikas, J. The role of supply management innovativeness and supplier orientation in firms' sustainability performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, v. 25, p. 100558, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100558

Luqmani, A.; Leach, M.; Jesson, D. Factors behind sustainable business innovation: The case of a global carpet manufacturing company. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 24, p. 94-105, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.007

Ma, J.; Hou, A.; Tian, Y. Research on the complexity of green innovative enterprise in dynamic game model and governmental policy making. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals: X, v. 2, p. 100008, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csfx.2019.100008

Mahdavinejad, M.; Zia, A.; Larki, A. N.; Ghanavati, S.; Elmi, N. Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on LEED norms in case of developing countries. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, v. 3, p. 235-246, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.06.003

Mani, V.; Agrawal, R.; Sharma, V. Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India. International Strategic Management Review, v. 2, p. 98-112, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2014.10.003

Mary, J. S.; Meenambal, T. Inventorisation of e-waste and developing a policy: Bulk consumer perspective. Procedia Environmental Sciences, v. 35, p. 643-655, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.058

Milios, L. Advancing to a circular economy: Three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix. Sustainability Science, v. 13, p. 861-878, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0502-9

Miska, C.; Szocs, I.; Schiffinger, M. Culture's effects on corporate sustainability practices: A multi-domain and multi-level view. Journal of World Business, v. 53, p. 263-279, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.12.001

Mityagin, S. A.; Tikhonova, O. B.; Repkin A. I. Methodology of estimation of achieving regional goals of sustainable development on the basis of program and goal oriented approach. Procedia Computer Science, v. 108, p. 2038-2048, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.060

Moldavska, A.; Welo, T. A holistic approach to corporate sustainability assessment: Incorporating sustainable development goals into sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, v. 50, p. 53-68, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.004

Montalbán-Domingo, L.; García-Segura, T.; Sanz, M. A.; Pellicer, E. Social sustainability in delivery and procurement of public construction contracts. Journal of Management in Engineering, v. 35, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000674

Moschetti, R.; Brattebo, H. Sustainable business models for deep energy retrofitting of buildings: State-of-the-art and methodological approach. Energy Procedia, v. 96, p. 435-445, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.174

Muller, A.; Bornschlegl, M.; Mantwill, F. Life cycle rating: An approach to support the decision-making process of manufacturing systems. Procedia Manufacturing, v. 21, p. 305-312, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.125

Musa, M. F.; Mohammad, F. M.; Mahbub, R.; Yusof, M. R. Enhancing the quality of life by adopting sustainable modular Industrialised Building System (IBS) in the Malaysian construction industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 153, p. 79-89, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.043

Nulkar, G. SMEs and environmental performance: A framework for green business strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 133, p. 130-140, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.177

ONU - Organizações das Nações Unidas. Guia sobre desenvolvimento sustentável: 17 objetivos para transformar o nosso mundo. 2018. Disponível em: <https://unric.org/pt/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2019/01/SDG_brochure_PT-web.pdf>. Acesso em: 27 fev. 2020.

Oviir, A. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in the framework of the next generation Estonian building standard building certification as a strategy for enhancing sustainability. Energy Procedia, v. 96, p. 351-362, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.159

Penz, E.; Hartl, B.; Hofmann, E. Explaining consumer choice of low carbon footprint goods using the behavioral spillover effect in German-speaking countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 214, p. 429-439, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.270

Pereira, M.; Silveira, M. A necessidade de adaptação às regulações ambientais da Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos: do fabricante ao consumidor organizacional no setor de equipamentos eletromédicos. Innovation & Management Review, v. 11, p. 88-109, 2015. https://doi.org/10.11606/rai.v11i4.100274

Petersen, K.; Feldt, R.; Mujtaba, S.; Mattsson, M. Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, p. 68-77, 2008.

Petersen, K.; Vakkalanka, S.; Kuzniarz, L. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology, v. 64, p. 1-18, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007

Pimenta, H. C. D.; Ball, P. D. Analysis of environmental sustainability practices across upstream supply chain management. Procedia CIRP, v. 26, p. 677-682, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.036

Prieto-Sandoval, V.; Jaca, C.; Ormazabal, M. Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 179, p. 605-615, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224

Qu, Y.; Li, M.; Jia, H.; Guo, L. Developing more insights on sustainable consumption in China based on Q Methodology. Sustainability, v. 7, p. 14211-14229, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71014211

Quak, H.; Nesterova, N.; Kok, R. Public procurement as driver for more sustainable urban freight transport. Transportation Research Procedia, v. 39, p. 428-439, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.045

Quoquab, F.; Mohammad, J. Environment dominant logic: Concerning for achieving the sustainability marketing. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 37, p. 234-238, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30119-8

Rao, P. H. Measuring environmental performance across a green supply chain: A managerial overview of environmental indicators. Vikalpa, v. 39, p. 57-74, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920140104

Riel, A.; Lelah A.; Mandil, G.; Rio, M.; Tichkiewitch, S.; Zhang, F.; Zwolinski, P. An innovative approach to teaching sustainable design and management. Procedia CIRP, v. 36, p. 29-34, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.059

Ritzén, S.; Sandstrom, G. O. Barriers to the circular economy: Integration of perspectives and domains. Procedia CIRP, v. 64, p. 7-12, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005

Rogetzer, P.; Silbermayr, L.; Jammernegg, W. Sustainable sourcing including capacity reservation for recycled materials: A newsvendor framework with price and demand correlations. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 214, p. 206-219, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.014

Russo, I.; Confente, I.; Scarpi, D.; Hazen, B. T. From trash to treasure: The impact of consumer perception of bio-waste products in closed-loop supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 218, p. 966-974, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.044

Sahamir, S. R.; Zakaria, R. Green assessment criteria for public hospital building development in Malaysia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, v. 20, p. 106-115, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.015

Santoyo-Castelazo, E.; Azapagic, A. Sustainability assessment of energy systems: Integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 80, p. 119-138, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061

Scherz, M.; Zunk, B. M.; Passer, A.; Kreiner, H. Visualizing interdependencies among sustainability criteria to support multicriteria decision-making processes in building design. Procedia CIRP, v. 69, p. 200-205, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.115

Secher, A. Q.; Collin, C.; Linnet, A. Construction product declarations and sustainable development goals for small and medium construction enterprises. Procedia CIRP, v. 69, p. 54-58, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.011

Senaratne, S.; Lambrousis, G.; Mirza, O.; Tam, V. W. Y.; Kang, W.-H. Recycled concrete in structural applications for sustainable construction practices in Australia. Procedia Engineering, v. 180, p. 751-758, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.235

Simion, C.-P.; Nicolescu, C.; Vrincut, M. Green procurement in Romanian construction projects. A cluster analysis of the barriers and enablers to green procurement in construction projects from the Bucharest-Ilfov Region of Romania. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 6231, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226231

Skerlos, S. J. Promoting effectiveness in sustainable design. Procedia CIRP, v. 29, p. 13-18, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.080

Sobotka, A.; Sagan, J. Cost-saving environmental activities on construction site - cost efficiency of waste management: Case study. Procedia Engineering, v. 161, p. 388-393, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.579

Stasiak-Betlejewska, R.; Potkány, M. Construction costs analysis and its importance to the economy. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 34, p. 35-42, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01598-1

Streimikiene, D. Environmental indicators for the assessment of quality of life. Intellectual Economics, v. 9, p. 67-69, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intele.2015.10.001

Sulistio, J.; Rini, T. A. A structural literature review on models and methods analysis of green supply chain management. Procedia Manufacturing, v. 4, p. 291-299, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.043

Thongplew, N.; Spaargaren, G.; Kris van Koppen, C. S. A. Companies in search of the green consumer: Sustainable consumption and production strategies of companies and intermediary organizations in Thailand. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, v. 83, p. 12-21, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2017.10.004

Tseng, M.-L.; Lin, Y.-H.; Tan, K.; Chen, R.-H.; Chenl, Y.-H. Using TODIM to evaluate green supply chain practices under uncertainty. Applied Mathematical Modelling, v. 38, p. 2983–2995, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.11.018

Uslu, Y. D.; Hancioglu, Y.; Demir, E. Applicability to green entrepreneurship in Turkey: A situation analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 195, p. 1238-1245, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.266

Uyarra, E.; Edler, J.; Garcia-Estevez, J.; Georghiou, L.; Yeow, J. Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective. Technovation, v. 34, p. 631-645, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.003

Vargas, C.; Mantilla, M. Organizational antecedents and capabilities for sustainable supply chain management in developing economies: The case of Colombian focal firms. Cuadernos de Administracion, v. 29, n. 3, p. 101-143, 2016. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cao29-53.oacs

Wang, C.; Liu, G.; Ren, S.; Liu, X.; Hao, Y. Provincial sustainability evaluation based on the standardized national emergy database. Energy Procedia, v. 88, p. 153-159, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.040

Watróbski, J. Ontology supporting green supplier selection process. Procedia Computer Science, v. 159, p. 1602-1613, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.331

Witjes, S.; Lozano, R. Towards a more Circular Economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 112, p. 37-44, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015

Xu, S.; Chu, C.; Ju, M.; Shao, C. System establishment and method application for quantitatively evaluating the green degree of the products in green public procurement. Sustainability, v. 8, n. 9, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090941

Yadavalli, V. S.; Darbari, J. D.; Bhayana, N.; Jha, P. C.; Agarwal, V. An integrated optimization model for selection of sustainable suppliers based on customers' expectations. Operations Research Perspectives, v. 6, 100113, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2019.100113

Younis, H.; Sundarakani, B.; O'Mahony, B. Green supply chain management and corporate performance: Developing a roadmap for future research using a mixed method approach. IIMB Management Review, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.10.011

Zausková, A.; Bezáková, Z.; Grib, L. Marketing communication in eco-innovation process. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 34, p. 670-675, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01684-6


 

ISSN 2359-1412