As dimensões e os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável após a Agenda 2030: uma revisão sistemática

Ronaldo Raasch Roberto Carlos Costa Lelis e Vanessa Maria Basso

Resumo
O objetivo da pesquisa foi investigar como o desenvolvimento sustentável, na perspectiva de suas dimensões, tem sido retratado na literatura científica após a criação da Agenda 2030. Ademais, buscou-se aglutinar os estudos pulverizados sobre o tema, por intermédio da estratificação das caraterísticas relacionadas aos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (ODS), segundo as dimensões estabelecidas pela ONU relativo ao desenvolvimento sustentável nos artigos pesquisados. Para o alcance dos objetivos, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática juntamente com uma análise bibliométrica a partir de um protocolo de revisão, que consistiu em estabelecer os critérios na escolha dos strings para buscar os artigos na base de dados do Web of Science (WoS), visando a determinar quais as informações seriam analisadas e que iriam compor este estudo. Os resultados evidenciaram um crescimento sustentável dos estudos sobre o desenvolvimento sustentável no período de 2016 a 2022 na ótica de suas dimensões e no alinhamento com os ODS. Contudo, foi percebido a ausência de artigos que trouxessem proposições unificadas e globais para elaboração, implantação, implementação e monitoramento de indicadores que medissem a evolução planetária quanto ao alcance dos ODS da Agenda 2030. A pesquisa apresenta uma revisão que possibilitou reconhecer com maior profundidade a evolução do tema desenvolvimento sustentável, suas dimensões e ODS após a criação da Agenda 2030, possibilitando a consolidação de novo conhecimento e avanço na teoria, oportunizando a validade dos dados e replicabilidade do estudo. E por fim, fica evidenciado que a evolução dos estudos sobre o tema dos estudos sobre o desenvolvimento sustentável apresenta-se como meta inadiável, devendo estar sempre na pauta do dia da comunidade científica global.

Palavras-chave
Dimensões do desenvolvimento sustentável; Revisão sistemática; Web of Science; ODS; Agenda 2030.

Abstract
The dimensions and the Sustainable Development Goals after the 2030 Agenda: A systematic review. The objective of the research was to investigate how sustainable development, from the perspective of its dimensions, has been portrayed in scientific literature after the creation of the 2030 Agenda. Furthermore, we sought to bring together the studies on the topic, through the stratification of characteristics related to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), according to the dimensions established by the UN regarding sustainable development in the articles researched. To achieve its objectives, the study carried out a systematic review together with a bibliometric analysis based on a review protocol that consisted of establishing the criteria for choosing strings to search for articles in the Web of Science (WoS) database, aiming to determine which information would be analyzed and would be composed this study. The results showed sustainable growth over the period from 2016 to 2022 in studies on the sustainable development from the perspective of its dimensions and in alignment with the SDGs. However, the absence of articles that brought unified and global propositions was noted to the elaboration, implementation, execution, and monitoring of indicators that measure planetary evolution in terms of achieving the SDGs of the 2030 Agenda. The research presents a review that made it possible to recognize in a deeper way the evolution of the sustainable development, its dimensions and SDGs after the creation of the Agenda 2030, enabling the consolidation of new knowledge and advancement in theory, providing data validity and study replicability. And finally, it is clear that the evolution of studies on the topic of sustainable development presents itself as an urgent goal, and should always be on the agenda of the global scientific community.

Keywords
Dimensions of sustainable development; Systematic Review; Web of Science; SDG; 2030 Agenda.

DOI
10.21438/rbgas(2023)102607

Texto completo
PDF

Referências
Adshead, D.; Thacker, S.; Fuldauer, L. I.; Hall, J. W. Delivering on the Sustainable Development Goals through long-term infrastructure planning. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensons, v. 59, 101975, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101975

Aleksandrova, M.; Costella, C. Reaching the poorest and most vulnerable: Addressing loss and damage through social protection. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 50, p. 121-128, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.010

Allen, C.; Metternicht, G.; Wiedmann, T.; Pedercini, M. Greater gains for Australia by tackling all SDGs but the last steps will be the most challenging. Nature Sustainability, v. 2, p. 1041-1050, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0409-9

Allen, C.; Metternicht, G.; Wiedmann, T.; Pedercini, M. Modelling national transformations to achieve the SDGs within planetary boundaries in small island developing states. Global Sustainability, v. 4, e.15, p. 1-13, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/SUS.2021.13

Andreoni, V.; Vargas, V. R. Tracking the interlinkages across SDGs: The case of Hill Centered Education Network in Bogota, Colombia. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 19, 7924, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197924

Araújo, C. A. A. Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais. Em Questão, v. 12, n. 1, p. 11-32, 2006.

Ashby, A.; Leat, M.; Hudson-Smith, M. Making connections: A review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Jounal, v. 17, n. 5, p. 497-516, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1108/1359854121125857

Barbosa, G. S. O desafio do desenvolvimento sustentável. Revista Visões, v. 4, n. 1, 2008.

Baum T.; Cheung, C.; Kong, H. Y.; Kralj, A.; Mooney, S.; Rhanh, H. N. T.; Ramachandran, S.; Ruzic, M. D.; Siow, M. L. Sustainability and the tourism and hospitality workforce: A thematic analysis. Sustainability, v. 8, v. 8, 809, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080809

Benson, D.; Gain, A. K.; Giupponi, C. Moving beyond water centricity? Conceptualizing integrated water resources management for implementing sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, v. 15, n. 2, p. 671-681, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00733-5

Boas, I.; Biermann, F.; Kanie, N. Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, v. 16, p. 449-464, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9321-1

Bonnedahl, K. J.; Heikkurinen, P.; Paavola, J. Strongly sustainable development goals: overcoming distances constraining responsible action. Environmental Science & Policy, v. 129, p. 150-158, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.004

Brundtland, G. Our common future: call for action. Environmental Conservation, v. 14, p. 291-294, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016805

Cai, J. L.; Zhao, D. D.; Varis, O. Match words with deeds: Curbing water risk with the Sustainable Development Goal 6 index. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 318, 128509, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128509

Canepa, C. Cidades sustentáveis: o município como lócus da sustentabilidade. São Paulo: RCS, 2007.

Casini, M.; Bastianoni, S.; Gagliardi, F.; Gigliotti, M.; Riccaboni, A.; Betti, G. Sustainable Development Goals indicators: A methodological proposal for a Multidimensional Fuzzy Index in the Mediterranean area. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 4, 1198, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041198

Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M. Combining participatory processes and Sustainable Development Goals to revitalize a rural area in Cantabria (Spain). Land, v. 9, n. 11, 412, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110412

Diep, L.; Martins, F. P.; Campos, L. C.; Hofmann, P.; Tomei, J.; Lakhanpaul, M.; Parikh, P. Linkages between sanitation and the sustainable development goals: A case study of Brazil. Sustainable Development, v. 29, n. 2, p. 339-352, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2149

Dinu, M.; Patarlageanu, S. R.; Petrariu, R.; Constantin, M.; Potcovaru, A. M. empowering sustainable consumer behavior in the eu by consolidating the roles of waste recycling and energy productivity. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 23, 9794, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239794

Escoz-Roldán, A.; Gutiérrez-Pérez, J.; Meira-Cartea, P. A. Water and climate change, two key objectives in the Agenda 2030: Assessment of climate literacy levels and social representations in academics from three climate contexts. Water, v. 12, n. 1, 92, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010092

Fang, Y. Influence of foreign direct investment from China on achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals in African countries. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, v. 19, n. 3, p. 213-220, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2021.12.023

Fonseca, F.; Carvalho, F. The reporting of SDGs by quality, environmental, and occupational health and safety-certified organizations. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 20, 5797, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205797

Fuldauer, L.; Ives, M. C.; Adshead, D.; Thacker, S.; Hall, J. W. Participatory planning of the future of waste management in small island developing states to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 223, p. 147-162, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.269

García-Peña, C.; Díaz, B.; Muñoz, M. M. Balancing the sustainability in the 2030 Agenda: The OECD countries. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, v. 19, n. 1, p. 243-271, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2022.2143530

Gil, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 7. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2019.

Hettiarachchi, H.; Meegoda, J. N.; Ryu, S. Organic waste buyback as a viable method to enhance sustainable municipal solid waste management in developing countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 15, n. 11, 2483, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112483

Hussein, H.; Menga, F.; Greco, F. Monitoring transboundary water cooperation in SDG 6.5.2: How a critical hydropolitics approach can spot inequitable outcomes. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 10, 3640, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103640

Iacobuţă, G. I.; Brandi, C.; Dzebo, A.; Duron, S. D. E. Aligning climate and sustainable development finance through an SDG lens. The role of development assistance in implementing the Paris Agreement. Global Environmental Change, v. 74, 102509, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102509

Iacobuţă, G. I.; Höhne, N.; van Soest, H. L.; Leemans, R. Transitioning to low-carbon economies under the 2030 Agenda: Minimizing trade-offs and enhancing co-benefits of climate-change action for the SDGs. Sustainability, v. 13, 10774, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910774

Kitchenham, B. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele: Keele University; Durham: Durham University, 2007. (Ebse Technical Report).

Knechtel, M. S. Metodologia da pesquisa em educação: uma abordagem teórico-prática dialogada. Curitiba: Intersaberes, 2014.

Lakatos, E. M.; Marconi, M. A. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 8. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2017.

Liu, Z.; Yang, H.-C.; Shiau, Y.-C. Investigation on evaluation framework of elementary school teaching materials for sustainable development. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 9, 3736, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093736

Maranghi, S.; Parisi, M. L.; Fachini, A.; Rubino, A.; Kordas, O.; Basosi, R. Integrating urban metabolism and life cycle assessment to analyse urban sustainability. Ecological Indicators, v. 112, n. 112, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106074

Miguel, P. A. C. Estudo de caso na Engenharia de Produção: estrutura e recomendações para sua condução. Produção, v. 17, n. 1, p. 216-229, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132007000100015

Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D. G.; The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, v. 6, n. 7, e1000097, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Nagabhatla, N.; Brahmbhatt, R. Geospatial assessment of water-migration scenarios in the context of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 6, 11, and 16. Remote Sensing, v. 12, 1376, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091376

Neumann, B.; Ott, K.; Kenchington, R. Strong sustainability in coastal areas: a conceptual interpretation of SDG 14. Sustainability Science, v. 12, n. 6, p. 1019-1035, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0472-y

Oliveira, G. M.; Vidal, D. G.; Ferraz, M. P.; Cabeda, J. M.; Ponmtes, M.; Maia, R. L.; Calheiros, J. M.; Barreira, E. Measuring health vulnerability: An interdisciplinary indicator applied to Mainland Portugal. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 16, n. 21, 4121, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214121

ONU - Organização das Nações Unidas. Transformando nosso mundo: a Agenda 2030 para o desenvolvimento sustentável. 2015. Disponível em: <https://nacoesunidas.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/agenda2030-pt-br.pdf>. Acesso em: 16 ago. 2023.

Pradhan, P.; Costa, L.; Rybski, D.; Lucht, W.; Kropp, J. P. A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interaction. Earths Future, v. 5, n. 11, p. 1169-1179, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632

Renzi, M. F.; Ungaro, V.; Di Pietro, L.; Mugion, R. G.; Pasca, M. G. Agenda 2030 and COVID-19: A young consumer's perception of sustainable consumption. Sustainability, v. 14, 15627, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315627

Rocchi, L.; Ricciolini, E.; Massei, G.; Paolotti, L.; Boggia, A. Towards the 2030 Agenda: Measuring the progress of the European Union Countries through the SDGs Achievement Index. Sustainability, v. 14, 3563, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063563

Roesch, S. M. A. Projetos de estágio e de pesquisa em Administração. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2013.

Sachs, I. Desenvolvimento includente, sustentável e sustentado. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond, 2008.

Schneider, F.; Klay, A.; Zimmermann, A. B.; Buser, T.; Ingalls, M.; Messerli, P. How can Science support the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development? Four tasks to tackle the normative dimension of sustainability. Sustainability Science, v. 14, n. 6, p. 1593-1604, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00675-y

Sen, A. Desenvolvimento como liberdade. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2010.

Silva, E. R. A. Os objetivos do desenvolvimento sustentável e os desafios da Nação. In: De Negri, J. A.; Araújo, B. C.; Bacellete, R. Desafios da Nação: artigos de apoio. Brasilia: IPEA, 2018. v. 2. p. 659-678.

Soergel, B.; Kriegler, E.; Weindl, I.; Rauner, S.; Dirnaichner, A.; Ruhe, C.; Hofmann, M.; Bauer, N.; Bertram, C.; Bodirsky, B. L.; Leimbach, M.; Leininger, J.; Levesque, A.; Luderer, G.; Pehl, M.; Wingens, C.; Baumstark, L.; Beier, F.; Dietrich, J. P.; Humpenöder, F.; von Jeetze, P.; Klein, D.; Koch, J.; Pietzcker, R.; Strefler. J.; Lotze-Campen, H.; Alexander Popp, A. A sustainable development pathway for climate action with in the UN 2030 Agenda. Nature Climate Change, v. 11, p. 656-664, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3

Turrioni, J. B.; Mello, C. H. P. Pesquisa-ação na Engenharia de Produção. In: Miguel, P. A. C. (Coord.). Metodologia de pesquisa em Engenharia de Produção e gestão de operações. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2012. p. 149-167.

Yang, H.; Dietz, T.; Li, Y.; Dou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Songer, M.; Liu, J. Unraveling human drivers behind complex interrelationships among Sustainable Development Goals: A demonstration in a flagship protected area. Ecology and Society, v. 27, n. 3, 15, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13275-270315


 

ISSN 2359-1412